This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There has been substantial growth in the use of experiments in publicmanagement over recent years. We asked a set of leading experimental researchers of publicmanagement to contribute and were delighted when all agreed to participate. Experiments should take their place alongside other methods in publicmanagement.
As publicmanagement scholars, we invest a lot of energy in doing research on public organizations, and most of us need answers to a very simple question: Why? Why should we use so much time to do publicmanagement research? How can publicmanagement research then actually contribute to solve real world problems?
In a forthcoming book, I define performance management as a continuous and cyclical process of making data-informed decisions to improve organizational outcomes.
To many scholars in the field of public administration and publicmanagement, the study of nonprofit organizations is viewed as a narrow niche, a handful of people working at the margins of the field on topics that largely sit outside of mainstream concerns for publicmanagers. Is this a desirable trend?
We have governments and we have clients in need of the publicservice staffed by civil servants. Nobody claimed perfection before we began, and everybody was aware of the underclasses of Americans who struggle to even vote.
Our new paper is now in print at the International PublicManagement Journal. Here’s the abstract: In this twin study we show that the penchant for a particular sector of employment has a genetic element: monozygotic twins evidencing a greater similarity of sector choice than dizygotic twins.
Here, I outline some of the challenges and opportunities we face as we work to develop top-notch undergraduate programs that advance publicservice. Especially for public universities, there is a need to generate revenue and students in seats translate to revenue. What We Gain from Undergraduate Programs.
Examples of this “snowball effect” include research on collaboration and publicservice motivation. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) has become a “different kind of beast” when compared to other public administration journals. “We
In other words, we either spruik the benefits of the neo-liberal, new publicmanagement framework of the past 40 years or advocate and even in some cases warmly predict the return of “socialism” or “big” government. Might the choice palette be more appetising than that sterile binary?
With procyclical fiscal policy, local governments usually face abrupt revenue shortfalls and high demand for publicservice during economic recession. Furthermore, there is tremendous uncertainty regarding the duration of the pandemic, the magnitude and requirement of federal government aid, and the public’s behavioral change.
He served for two years in the army at the White Sand Proving Grounds in New Mexico after which he became part of the then Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s Whiz kids; a group which advised McNamara in his efforts to turn around the management of the Department of Defense in the 1960s. Evaluators Association in 1996.
I remember having a discussion with Jack Knott shortly after the great recession about the growing emphasis in our field of private provision of publicservices. Foundation Professor of Organization Design and PublicManagement | Center for Organization Research and Design (CORD) | Arizona State University.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 40,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content