This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Managing donors, members, and constituents is essential to the success of most nonprofits. About CiviCRM Over 11,000 nonprofit organizations around the world use CiviCRM to build and manage their donor, member, and constituent bases. Customer relationship management (CRM) systems are an important part of this process.
Priorities for States Each year, the National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO) publishes federal advocacy priorities that represent areas of focus for the upcoming year and how states can collaborate with federal agencies, Congress, the White House and strategic partners.
Unlike DC's "constituency service" programs by Councilmembers and the Mayor's Office, these initiatives are designed to support DIY self-help efforts driven independently of elected officials. Pedestrian advocacy organizations like Feet First in Seattle have provided a great deal of support to Walk to School efforts.
Or is it just a case, in a highly politicized industry, of a politically convenient advocacy rationale to justify not increasing G-fees? In this case, that means that primary market lenders, a very important constituency in the U.S. But is this argument valid? For several reasons, in my view, the argument is not substantially valid.
A legislator could stand in front of constituents and show a graph of the revenue shortfall and explain that the budget had to be cut and taxes raised because the state was required to balance its budget.
They believe passing nothing would be worse, what with their valuing their re-election prospects more than their constituents’ well-being. But broad-based research and advocacy organizations—and the rest of us interested parties—need be less focused on this one hot issue, when there are already many others.
Different populations of constituents are reached through different means. Earthx2025 is a five-day forum that convenes a variety of leaders in business, investment, innovation, philanthropy, academia, government, public policy and environmental advocacy. EarthX2025 -April 20-24, 2025, Dallas.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 40,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content